tensorflow GitHub Pull Requests Dashboard | GitLights
avatar

tensorflow GitHub Pull Requests Analytics

GitHub Activity Summary

In November 2025, the TensorFlow GitHub organization exhibited a striking metric: the average time to merge pull requests (PRs) improved to an impressive 0 hours, a significant enhancement from the previous average of 48.84 hours. This rapid merging process underscores the organization's commitment to efficiency in code repository management, allowing contributors to see their efforts recognized promptly. However, this metric also highlights a concerning trend in overall engagement and activity within the repository.

During the same month, TensorFlow recorded a total of only 2 PR reviews, with an average of 0 PR submissions per developer per day—reflecting a 100% drop from previous months. This drastic decline raises critical questions regarding community engagement and the vitality of the project. While the average reviews per developer per day increased to 2.0, indicating that those involved are dedicated to maintaining high code quality, the lack of new contributions suggests a potential stagnation in developer contribution trends.

Moreover, the organization faced a stark absence of comments and conversations, with an average of 0 interactions per developer per day. This lack of communication may hinder collaborative efforts and stifle innovation, suggesting a need for strategic initiatives to foster dialogue among developers. The current state indicates that while the review quality remains high, the overall project health is at risk due to diminishing engagement.

In conclusion, TensorFlow's GitHub performance in November 2025 reveals a paradox: a commitment to code quality through effective review processes juxtaposed with alarming declines in open-source metrics such as PR submissions and community interactions. To revitalize the project, focused efforts on enhancing developer engagement and fostering a collaborative environment are essential for sustaining long-term engineering investment.

Evolution of Pull Requests with EMA and RSI
Comments, Reviews, and Conversations in Pull Requests
Pull Requests by Repository

tflite-micro

43%

tensorflow

23%

quantum

23%

tfx-bsl

7%

fairness-indicators

5%
Conversations, Comments, and Reviews in PR's
Total reviews

47

Total conversations

28

Total comments

34

Developers' Indicators Table in Pull Requests
DeveloperTotal PRsTotal reviewsTotal conversationsReviews per PRConversations per PRComments per conversationsTime to merge
100261.725736
5001.611.295479
1001003839
1001005
11131.30.71.630072

1 to 5 of 32

Rows per page:

Repositories' Indicators Table in Pull Requests
RepoTotal PRsTotal reviewsTotal conversationsReviews per PRConversations per PRComments per conversationsTime to merge
d
docs
110100959
fi
fairness-indicators
242211.5134
m
metadata
123231372
ma
model-analysis
100000202
q
quantum
10300.300973

1 to 5 of 12

Rows per page:

Comparison of Indicators with Average of Other Organizations in Pull Requests
Average PRs per developer per day

0.08

0.08
0%
Average reviews per developer per day

0.15

0.08
0.87%
Average comments per developer per day

0.19

0.09
1.11%
Average time to merge PR (hours)

0.64

48.84
-0.99%
Lines of code balance per PR

1,895.62

988.03
0.92%
Files changed per PR

6.92

10.47
-0.34%
Our Mission

In Gitlights, we are focused on providing a holistic view of a development team's activity. Our mission is to offer detailed visualizations that illuminate the insights behind each commit, pull request, and development skill. With advanced AI and NLP algorithms, Gitlights drives strategic decision-making, fosters continuous improvement, and promotes excellence in collaboration, enabling teams to reach their full potential.


Powered by Gitlights |
2026 © Gitlights

v2.8.0