tensorflow GitHub Comments Analytics

Evolution of Comments with EMA and RSI

Sentiment Evolution Over Time

Sentiment Distribution

Negative: 5%

Neutral: 88%

Positive: 7%

Comment Type Evolution Over Time

Comment Type Distribution

General Feedback: 68%

Bug Report: 11%

Question: 7%

Testing Related: 6%

Documentation Request: 6%

Nitpick: 1%

Refactor Suggestion: 1%

Suggestion: 1%

Technical Category Distribution

Testing: 73%

Database: 9%

Code Quality: 6%

Security: 6%

Performance: 3%

Architecture: 2%

Urgency Distribution

Low: 54%

Medium: 31%

High: 4%

Critical: 11%

Developers' Comments Indicators Table

Developer	Comments	Avg Words	Avg Urgency	Tech Depth	Sentiment	Readability	Constructiveness	Questions	Action Items	Impact Score
mihaimaruseac	53	19	1.17	0.62	-0.05	7.75	5.13	9	40	2.07
ddavis-2015	44	21	1.46	1.08	-0.01	6.11	5.1	10	29	2.24
veblush	34	8	0.92	1.28	0.09	6.04	5.17	4	4	2.14
lhutton1	18	29	1.32	0.55	0.03	7.03	5.28	10	5	2.11
sahas3	13	77	1.69	2.14	0.19	4.89	5.5	5	7	2.92

1 to 5 of 13

Rows per page:

Repositories' Comments Indicators Table

Repository	Comments	Total Words	Avg Urgency	Tech Depth	Sentiment	Readability	Constructiveness	Positive %	High Priority
tensorflow	88	2630	1.29	0.85	0	7.16	5.2	53.8	15
tflite-micro	80	1224	1.38	1.17	0.01	6.05	5.11	75	7
quantum	6	174	0.23	0.54	-0.01	7.12	5	0	0

1 to 3 of 3

Rows per page:

Our Mission

AI has fundamentally changed software development. Gitlights exists to help engineering leaders navigate this shift. We measure what traditional analytics can't: the real value each developer brings as an individual contributor. Because in a world where anyone can generate code, understanding who drives real impact is the new competitive advantage.

Resources

v2.8.0