This is a real dashboard built from a public GitHub organization (OpenAI).

See this dashboard with your GitHub organization

Install GitLights and get these insights from your own repositories in minutes.

Same metrics, but for your private repositoriesTeam and individual-level visibilityAutomatically updated from GitHub activity
avatar

openai GitHub Pull Requests Analytics

GitHub Activity Summary

OpenAI's GitHub organization reveals a surprising trend in developer productivity and code contribution analysis for January 2026: despite a steady flow of contributions, there is a notable absence of peer reviews and comments.

During this month, OpenAI recorded a total of 4 pull requests (PRs), all originating from the key "codex" repository. This focused activity highlights the organization's commitment to maintaining project health. The average PRs per developer per day stands at 1.0, indicating active participation, yet the average reviews per developer remains at 0. This lack of feedback suggests a significant area for improvement in fostering a collaborative environment.

Moreover, the average comments per developer also sits at 0, which points to a deficiency in dialogue surrounding contributions. The average time to merge PRs is relatively efficient at 21.32 hours, while the lines of code balance per PR averages 663.25 with 10.25 files changed per PR. These metrics indicate that while contributions are meaningful, the complexity remains manageable.

Despite the absence of reviews and comments, the total conversations recorded is 10, suggesting some level of engagement. However, the slight decline in PR metrics compared to previous periods indicates a need for renewed focus on collaboration and communication.

In conclusion, while OpenAI's GitHub activity in January 2026 showcases a steady flow of contributions, enhancing review and comment engagement will be critical for improving developer productivity and overall project health. This analysis serves as a valuable resource for those interested in engineering investment analysis and developer contribution trends.

Evolution of Pull Requests with EMA and RSI
Comments, Reviews, and Conversations in Pull Requests
Pull Requests by Repository

codex

100%
Conversations, Comments, and Reviews in PR's
Total reviews

0

Total conversations

0

Total comments

0

Developers' Indicators Table in Pull Requests
DeveloperTotal PRsTotal reviewsTotal conversationsReviews per PRConversations per PRComments per conversationsTime to merge
100192.112799
100000
100000
100012

1 to 4 of 4

Rows per page:

Repositories' Indicators Table in Pull Requests
RepoTotal PRsTotal reviewsTotal conversationsReviews per PRConversations per PRComments per conversationsTime to merge
c
codex
41100.22.52.11279

1 to 1 of 1

Rows per page:

Comparison of Indicators with Average of Other Organizations in Pull Requests
Average PRs per developer per day

0.00

0.08
11.5%
Average reviews per developer per day

0.00

0.08
-1%
Average comments per developer per day

0.00

0.09
-1%
Average time to merge PR (hours)

0.00

48.84
-0.56%
Lines of code balance per PR

0.00

988.03
-0.33%
Files changed per PR

0.00

10.47
-0.02%

Get this dashboard for your organization

15-day free trial. No setup beyond GitHub.

Start free trial
Our Mission

AI has fundamentally changed software development. Gitlights exists to help engineering leaders navigate this shift. We measure what traditional analytics can't: the real value each developer brings as an individual contributor. Because in a world where anyone can generate code, understanding who drives real impact is the new competitive advantage.


Powered by Gitlights |
2026 © Gitlights

v2.8.0